Brent Riggs


FREE SUBSCRIPTION
BLOG DIRECTORY

ISSUE CONTENTS

cover
editor
book preview
serious.photos
dear.brent
serious.reviews
serious.spirit
serious.money
serious.professional
serious.health
serious.family
features
serious.extras
blog posts
columns

 

Magazine
ISSUE 13  
STORIES & FEATURES:   First | Previous | Next | Last
 

serious.extras

Myth: World History Goes Back Much Further Than Biblical History

By James Nienhuis

Print content

Send this page
to a friend
The following is an excerpt from Old Earth? Why Not! by James Nienhuis. Get your free copy here...

Egypt, considered by many to be the world’s oldest civilization, is said to have had royal dynas­ties which began before 3000 B.C. Since the Flood occurred about 2400 B.C. (as deduced by counting the ages of the patriarchs in the Bible), it seems one of these figures is incorrect.

The Egyptian historian, Manetho, who lived around 300 B.C., compiled a list of Egyptian kings that is the cornerstone of mainstream ancient Egyp­tian chronological studies. However, his list has been shown to be fraught with inaccuracies. The scholar James H. Breasted wrote that Manetho’s list of kings is “a late, careless and uncritical compilation which can be proven wrong from the contemporary monu­ments in the vast majority of cases, where such monu­ments have survived.”1 Sir Alan Gardner mocks Manetho’s work in saying, “what is proudly adver­tised as Egyptian history is merely a collection of rags and tatters.”

Sir Isaac Newton noted that Manetho reported the same reigns twice under different names, listed kings in the wrong order, corrupted their names, re­peated them again and again, and included the names of other great men and women who were only the relations of kings or their viceroys or secretaries of state.3 Ancient Egypt had regional rulers who con­trolled various “kingdoms” within Egypt simulta­neously. These contemporaneous kings were inaccu­rately recorded by Manetho in sequential order,4 there­fore, Manetho’s list should not trusted, and the timeline for ancient Egypt must be shortened.

The heavy rainfall in Egypt, during the Ice Age, is evidenced by the extensive water erosion of the lime­stone quarry in which the allegedly 4,500-year-old Sphinx was built, and now rests. But the Ice Age sup­posedly ended 10,000 years ago? Much heavier rain did water the Middle East and northern Africa in the centuries after the Flood, and thus, caused the inten­sive limestone weathering of the Sphinx’s quarry.

China is said to date back to about 3000 B.C. This date is based upon the flawed carbon 14 results from ancient settlements and the allegedly long “leg­endary period” of China. One of the legendary he­roes named “Yu” engineered a massive land reclama­tion project. Apparently, a large area was flooded with water, and he organized the project which drained the land of this water. Could this be one of the re­sidual “puddles” from Noah’s Flood that was discussed in Chapter 10?

One ancient classic Chinese writing, called the Hikking, tells the story of Fuhi, whom the Chinese consider to be the father of their civilization. This history records that Fuhi, his wife, three sons and three daughters, escaped a great flood. He and his family were the only people left alive on earth. After the great flood they repopulated the world. An ancient temple in China has a wall painting that shows Fuhi’s vessel in the raging flood waters. Dolphins are swimming around the boat and a dove with an olive branch in its beak is flying towards it.6

Details in this story virtually match the Biblical details, as do details in other flood legends from around the world (which are discussed in Chapter 5). The first solar eclipse ever recorded happened in 2134 B.C. in China, so it appears the “legendary period” in China is not as long as popularly imagined.7 But, the “stone age” settlements’ assumed great antiquity (due to flawed 14C dates) allows old earthers to imagine that the Chi­nese civilization is older than it really is.

The ancient Babylonians are said to have begun building their impressive structures about 3000 B.C. However, a king of Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar, (who ruled about 500 B.C.) wrote on a plaque that was dis­covered at the ruins of an ancient tower, that he (Nebuchadnezzar) had refurbished this tower which originally was nearly completed by the first king of Babylon, but could not be completed because the build­ers could no longer understand one another’s spoken words. Nebuchadnezzar further inscripted on the plaque that this first king ruled 42 generations before about 500 B.C.8 Here an ancient king of Babylon stated that Babylon began about 2200 B.C.!

This time frame fits that presented in the Bible; Nimrod, occultist and rebel against God, was the first king of Babylon, about 200 years after the Flood. At the tower of Babel, God confused the languages, so the clans then could not understand each other, and hence, moved away from Mesopotamia as God had previously commanded, “Go forth and repopulate the world.” Legends of this historical event abound from disparate people groups from around the world.9

Astronomical records, obtained by Alexander the Great from the Babylonians, are dated back 1903 years from 331 B.C. The Babylonians told Alexander that Babylon began when the astronomical records began, in 2234 B.C.10 This is the record of Babylonians, not the possessors of the Old Testament, the Jews. The Babylonians had no interest in historical agree­ment with their rivals, the Jews. And yet, both na­tions agree on the time of the founding of Babylon.

According to the fourth century historian Eusebius of Caesarea, Egialeus, the first king in Greece, began his reign in 2089 B.C., 1313 years before the first Olympiad in 776 B.C.11 Yet, old earthers say Greece and the other civilizations are older than in­dicated because of faith in the flawed carbon 14 re­sults (as explained in Chapter 12) and their Darwin­ian philosophy. These results and philosophy have been shown to be doubtful, at best; therefore, we should look hard at the truly solid scientific and his­torical evidences.

The Byzantine chronicler, Constatinius Manasses, wrote that the Egyptians state lasted 1663 years. If correct, then counting backward from the time that Cambyses, King of Persia, conquered Egypt in 526 B.C., gives us the year 2188 B.C. for the founding of Egypt.12 Menes, the legendary founder of Egypt, is the Misraim (Hebrew) or Mestre (Greek) of the sec­ond generation from Noah. Once again the Biblical timeframe matches.

When the Saxons began to migrate to Britain from the European mainland about 500 A.D., the native Britains (Welsh) noted the barbarous, pagan savagery of their new neighbors. The Saxons practiced ances­tor worship (of Odin and Geat), and had no knowl­edge of the Bible. The Welsh (which ironically means “barbaric foreigner” in Saxon13) had been evangelized about 300 years before, so the cold-blooded, pagan lifestyle of the Saxons was appalling to the Welsh.

These “savages” brought with them records of their kings going back to their first king, Noah. These, obviously Biblically ignorant Saxons, compiled their king’s list through the centuries, with the Biblical Noah appearing as their first king.15 We know that the Biblical personages of Noah and the Saxon’s sec­ond king, Sceaf (corruption of Iafeth or Japheth), were not inserted at the beginning of their king’s list, after Saxon christianization, for several reasons. Once they became christianized, the Saxons changed their sec­ond king’s name to Iafeth or Japheth (as in the Bible) because they realized Sceaf was a corrupted spelling of Japheth, as they read the book of Genesis. They wanted to get it right. And if the king’s list was con­cocted to concur with Genesis ancestries, why did they stop at only two Biblical people to fraudulently insert into their lineage? And why did they report that Sceaf (changed later to Japheth) was born on the Ark,16 when the Bible clearly states that he helped build the Ark?

There were five Saxon clans that came to England around 500 A.D. These respective clans had their own unique king’s lists that converged in the distant past at their common ancestor, Odin. This Odin was wor­shipped by all the Saxon clans as a deified forefather. The Saxon clans’ lists are identical from Odin back to Sceaf (Japheth), and to Noah. These rival clans did not want to have common ancestry with their rival “Houses” (House of Lindsay, House of Kent, House of Mercia, House of Northumbria, House of East Anglica), and yet, they could not deny their com­mon heritage.

The Vikings of Scandinavia also trace their kings back through Odin, Seskef (Japheth), and Noe (Noah). Why would the Saxons and the Vikings, arch­enemies for centuries, agree to get along and fake their kings’ lists, as to have common ancestors and Biblical people as their shared, earliest kings? The Viking’s were not evangelized until at least 900 A.D., so the christianized Saxons (evangelized about 500 A.D.) looked with horror at the practices of these barbaric Vikings; no way could these savages from the north have our heritage, thought the Saxons. But they did, no doubt, because they were once united on the Eu­ropean mainland some 2,000 years before.

The Welsh trace their kings all the way back to Noah, as well. Noah’s son, Japheth, is listed, as is his grandson Javan; from there, the king’s list goes off into strange non-Biblical names of kings or tribes. We know that this list was compiled by Biblically il­literate pagans because the source material is from ancient literature, written in a now extinct language (from before the time of Christ), which was trans­lated into modern languages at several points during the Dark Ages (500-1200 A.D. )

The Miautso tribe of southern China also traces its ancestry back through a son of Japheth, the son of Noah. Whereas the Welsh trace through Japheths’ son Javan, the Miautso trace through another of Japheth’s (Jah-phu’s) sons, Gomer (Gomena). Also within their history are the brothers of Japheth (Jah-phu), Ham (Lo Han) and Shem (Lo Shen). The Miatso seemed to know a lot about the Bible without having even heard of it. Their Noah (Nuah) rode out a catastrophic global flood, released a dove (remember the Chinese wall art?), and landed on the drying land. They trace their lineage even farther back than Noah (Nuah), all the way to the first man, whose name translates “Dirt”20 (Adam was formed from the earth).

Historians even corroborate this pre-Flood world where the Bible says people lived 800-900 years. The following pagan ancient historians mention much longer life spans in a previous age: Hestiaeus, Mochus, Berosus, Manetho, Hieronymus, Hesiod, Hecataeus, Ephorus, and Nicolaus.

These long life spans were made possible by: a much larger gene pool than had Noah’s small group, lower UV radiation in the pre-Flood world caused by possibly higher atmospheric pressure and by stronger earth magnetism (that deflected UV), higher oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere (as reflected in Flood sedimentary rocks), and per­haps other factors. After the Flood, the limited gene pool of the eight survivors (the genetic bottleneck theorized by secular geneticists, and noted in Chap­ter 14) coupled with the diminution of the aforemen­tioned pre-Flood conditions, resulted in progressively diminished life spans during the ten generations, or so, after the Flood.

So you can see that secular history actually cor­roborates the most accurate history book ever writ­ten, the Bible. These pagan tribes, absent the Hebrew account of history, nevertheless had a general knowl­edge of the Flood and the ensuing genealogies, as re­lated to them by their ancestors, the offspring of Noah’s sons.

Author and speaker, James Nienhuis has a B.Sc. in Earth Sciences from Dartmouth College. His blog is www.dancingfromgenesis.com




ISSUE 13  
STORIES & FEATURES:  First | Previous | Next | Last
Magazine

We publish YOU!
Submit your blog posts, stories, articles and photos. We love to publish stuff from our readers and blogging friends!
Submit photos | articles

Tulsa Design Works Inc. |
Box 14 | Washington, OK 73093 | Email Us